You are all the most racist bigots I have even encountered in my entire life. If you are truly in favor of reform, you would never support Hillary Clinton whose Clinton Foundation is laden with scandal and steals money from third-world nations to line its own pockets. It is one thing to be opposed to what you all call the “new Democratic Party” but it is absurd to believe that you will get the change that is needed under McCain. More importantly, what exactly will a McCain presidency achieve? If any of you had a remotely eloquent argument for opposing Obama I, as a Clinton supporter might have defected from the party, but your responses represent the unfounded fear and bigotry that this primary season should have helped America to overcome.
From Party.Unity.My.Ass = PUMA, 2008/06/13 at 2:08 PM
So you’d rather McCain win?
He doesn’t call women sweetie. He uses another name that’s four letters long and begins with c.
From “I’m not your sweetie!”, 2008/06/12 at 12:49 PM
17. vp | June 16, 2008 at 1:59 pm
YOU COWARDS DON’T HAVE THE GUTS TO JUST STATE THAT YOUR PROBLEM IS YOU HAVE 2 CHOICES. ONE BLACK AND ONE WHITE. NOW I WONDER IN THIS COUNTRY WHO YOU’RE GOING TO VOTE FOR. IT DEFINITELY WON’T BE THE BLACK MAN. JUST SAY WHAT YOU COWARDS FEEL INSTEAD OF COMING UP WITH ALL KINDS OF STUPID REASONS FOR NOT VOTING FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA…… YA’ BITCHES
1. Jennifer | June 19, 2008 at 12:34 pm
As if you give a FUCK about black people and didn’t use this as an excuse to bash Barack. This is the problem with Hillary and her cult – she thinks black people are stupid and treats them as such.
If you have a problem with Obama, say so. But don’t go hiding because your so-called concern for the black race to do it. The sooner you HillBillies leave the Democratic party, the better.
7. Jennifer | June 20, 2008 at 10:03 pm
Awwww, PJ. You sound butthurt. Not too sure how education stacks up on your side of the election, CUNT, (I can call you condescending names, too!), but we in the Obama Nation tend to work and EARN our degrees, just like our leader/Messiah and his equally brilliant wife. That requires not only reading, but math – a subject you HillBillies have shown us time and again that you’re quite weak in. Very strong marks for creative writing, though.
Seeing that there’s nothing about your position that states why you’re supporting McCain, it’s safe to assume that your disdain for Obama boils down to “he’s black and I’m bitter.” That’s fine. I have no problem with your position, and I apologize if I made it seem as if I do. Just stop pretending that you have any concern for black people, when your posts clearly show the opposite. You really think we need YOU to tell us how to think?
And why aren’t you angrier at your fellow white women who apparently betrayed you? Obama isn’t winning because of the “black vote” – there aren’t that many black people in this country. If he beat your girl Hillz, it had to have been because of more people who look like you.
BTW, LMAO @ you always talking about the “women vote.” I know this may shock you, but black women are women, too, and we’re far and away for Obama. Sorry. See you in four years!
LOSERS! LOSERS!…ALL RACIST UNDERTONES…WHITE WORKING CLASS ?..PALEEEZ…ANY THINKING BLACK PERSON WOULD NOT VOTE FOR THE CLINTONS FOR ONE REASON “RWANDA” MILLIONS DIED..WHILE CLINTON WAS GETTING A BLOW JOB, AND LIED ABOUT BOTH…THE DOT COM FIASCO…PARDONS..STEALING FURNITURE FROM THE WHITEHOUSE AMONGST ALL THE OTHER SCANDALS..WHICH HELPED BUSH WIN..NOW WE HAVE IRAQ, KATRINA GITMO, ENRON HOUSING CRISIS ETC, ETC, IF YOU HATE OBAMA VOTE FOR YOUR VAGINA!!!!!
VOTE OBAMA 08
From Party.Unity.My.Ass = PUMA, 2008/06/27 at 3:10 PM
June 17, 2008 at 7:35 am
I am shocked by the amount of hatred and vitriol that Democrats have for their nominee. Where does this come from? Hillary was the front runner. She had the money, the big donors, the big super delegates, the organization and the name to win it all. It was hers to lose. How can she possibly make herself out to be the victim? If someone asked me whose campaign was more negative and dirtier, I would have to say Clinton’s. I’m sure the vast majority of Americans would agree with me, and you can’t blame all of that on the media. So how is she the victim? The greatest thing about Clinton’s campaign was that she was judged on the merits. She didn’t lose because was a woman. She lost because people didn’t like her. That’s not sexist. I was proud of the fact that she didn’t make her campaign about being a woman. But in blaming her defeat on sexism, she works to erase any strides made by her campaign. Can’t you all see that? And for those of you with so much hatred in your heart for the candidate, perhaps you should take a good long look at the real basis for that anger. Hillary wasn’t victimized; nothing was stolen from her. Perhaps it’s something else about Obama that makes you feel so threatened.
June 17, 2008 at 10:27 am
Mattie, my boy… you are a boy, right? You don’t get it! The koolaid Obama’s troops fed you has affected your senses. I was going to move your email because you’re obviously too dumb to realize that ‘hate’ mail isn’t a good place to post a reply.
But thanks for the comment. I’ll leave it where it is. You hate women. I hate Obama. That’s sexism on your part, buddy. I have pages of reasons I don’t like Obie… you didn’t give me any reason not to like Hillary.
Bye.
June 17, 2008 at 2:17 pm
I’m not sure how anyone can infer that I hate women from my post. That’s just….silly. The problem is that Hillary legitamizes that kind of thinking when she blames her defeat on sexism. Her comment of “18 million breaks in the glass ceiling” is absurd. Those 18 million people voted for her not because she is a woman, but because they thought she was the best candidate. That’s an amazing testament to the strides women have made in this country. She lost because more people thought the other candidate was better; end of story. There is no glass ceiling.
There’s something else going on here to cause all of this anger. Anyone have any other ideas?
June 18, 2008 at 12:42 am
Hillary didn’t blame her defeat on anything… she won the popular vote and if the DNC hadn’t maneuvered the delegates in FL and MI and given some of her delegates to Obama, she would have had more delegates than him, too.
Stop writing to the hate mail page, please.
June 18, 2008 at 1:28 am
She won the popular vote.
If you don’t include several caucus states.
Oh, and if you give her the Michigan tally without giving Obama anything from there, which I suppose would be pretty hard given that his name wasn’t on the ballot.
So yeah, New Math for the “New Democrats” from the 90’s.
You know, more than anything I’m actually ashamed that Clinton was the first viable woman. I think we could do WAY better.
July 13, 2008 at 12:23 pm
But thanks for the comment. I’ll leave it where it is. You hate women. I hate Obama. That’s sexism on your part, buddy.
Where in Matt’s post was there sexism?
Look, Hillary ran a historic campaign. But she lost to a candidate that played the game of politics better than her. And now Hillary’s working to help get Obama elected as president. She accepts the fact that she lost. Why can’t you?
July 13, 2008 at 4:48 pm
Not no but hell no I will never vote for that arrogant SOB,
August 6, 2008 at 1:18 pm
WOW I JUST AM AMAZED AT THE AMOUNT OF SORE LOSERS ON THIS WEBSITE. I MEAN HILLARY LOST, WHAT DO YOU WANT TO DO PUT MCCAIN IN THE WHITE HOUSE? IF YOU DO THEN ALL OF YOU WILL HAVE THE BLOOD OF MORE DEAD AMERICANS ON YOUR HANDS, FOR A SENSELESS BATTLE IN IRAQ. YOU ALL WHO VOTE FOR MCCAIN WILL BE RESPONIBLE FOR THIS COUNTRY CONTINUING IN THE DIRECTION IT IS CURRENTLY ON. I MEAN SERIOUSLY YOU SOUND LIKE THOSE ANGRY PARENTS THAT NEVER MADE THEIR DREAM COME TRUE SO THEY LIVE THEIR LIVES THROUGH THEIR KIDS, FORCING THEM TO PLAY FOOTBALL, OR GO INTO BALLET OR SOMETHING. I MEAN I KNOW YOU WERE PUTTING ALL YOUR HOPES AND DREAMS THROUGH HILLARY, BUT IF YOU SUPPORTED HER SO MUCH AND RESPECT HER JUDGEMENT WHY DON’T YOU NOW RESPECT HER JUDGEMENT TO SUPPORT OBAMA?
August 6, 2008 at 1:26 pm
HILLARY LOST BECAUSE SHE LACKS THAT CHARISMA, AND ABILITY TO CONNECT WITH PEOPLE, OTHERWISE SHE WOULD HAVE WON. HILLARY RAN A POOR CAMPAIGN IN THE BEGINNING WITH HER IM THE INEVITABLE WINNER ATTITUDE. HILLARY LOST SHE WONT RUN AGAIN, IT’S OVER,
August 13, 2008 at 11:17 am
I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU HILLARY SUPPORTERS, IF MCCAIN IS YOUR CANDIDATE THEN WHY ARE YOU A DEMOCRAT? ESPECIALLY IN A YEAR WHEN REPUBLICANS ARE SWITCHING TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, I MEAN JUST ADMIT THAT YOU GUYS ARE THE PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE SORE LOSERS THAT AT THIS POINT ARE NOT VOTING ON THE ISSUES BUT ON YOUR EMOTIONS. HILLARY LOST, AND IF SHE HAD GOTTEN THE NOMINATION SHE WOULD LOSE TO MCCAIN BECAUSE INDEPENDENTS AND REPUBLICANS LOATH HER. OBAMA ON THE OTHER HAND IS MUCH MORE LIKED BY THE INDEPENDENTS, AND REPUBLICANS THAT HAVE SWITCHED OVER.
August 13, 2008 at 11:23 am
OH AND BY THE WAY YOU HAVE 99 REASONS NOT TO VOTE FOR OBAMA BUT RACE AINT ONE…. WELL WE OBAMA SUPPORTERS HAVE 99 REASONS NOT TO VOTE FOR HILLARY AND HER BEING A B$tch IS THE NUMBER ONE!
August 13, 2008 at 11:29 am
Learn to use your computer. Take the cap lock off.
August 14, 2008 at 10:08 am
ITS A FREE COUNTRY AND ILL TYPE THE WAY I WANT TO TYPE!
August 14, 2008 at 10:34 am
NOW WE HAVE RUSSIA INVADING GEORGIA, HMMMM I GUESS WHEN YOU HAVE PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY THAT STILL SUPPORT THE IRAQ WAR AND SUPPORT CANDIDATES LIKE HILLARY WHO VOTED FOR THE WAR THEN THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO LEAVE US UNABLE TO ACT AGAINST REAL THREATS TO THE STABILITY OF DEMOCRACY AND ULTIMATELY OUR SECURITY. THE LONG PROTRACTED BATTLE IN IRAQ HAS MADE US SPEND OUR RESOURCES, AND TIED UP OUR TROOPS TO THE POINT WHERE WE ARE UNABLE TO ACT AGAINST PUTIN AND HIS KGB COLD WAR AMBITIONS. THIS IS ONE OF THE REASONS WHY OBAMA KNEW THAT IRAQ WAS A BAD IDEA, BECAUSE HE KNOWS FROM HISTORY WHEN YOU FIGHT MULTIPLE BATTLES IN DIFFERENT PLACES AT THE SAME TIME YOU LEAVE YOURSELF VULNERABLE BECAUSE YOU STRETCH YOUR MILITARY. OBAMA KNEW THIS BECAUSE HE KNOWS HIS HISTORY, HE KNEW THAT ROME DID THE SAME THING WHICH MADE THEM VULNERABLE TO THE BARBARIANS. WELL GUESS WHAT HILLARY DID NOT HAVE THAT JUDGEMENT WHEN SHE VOTED FOR THE WAR, ALL SHE CARED ABOUT WAS LOOKING TOUGH FOR THE ELECTION DOWN THE ROAD. YET YOU NOT ONLY SUPPORT HER AND HER POOR JUDGEMENT BUT YOU CONTINUE TO SUPPORT MCSAME AND HIS CONTINUATION OF THE BUSH POLICY WHICH WASTES OUR RESOURCES ON A COUNTRY THAT HAS BILLIONS ALREADY IN BANKS AROUND THE WORLD FROM THEIR OIL THAT WE PAY FOR!WE COULD BE USING THOSE RESOURCES TO CATCH AND KILL BIN LADEN IN PAKISTAN, WE COULD BE USING THOSE RESOURCES TO BLOCK PUTIN’S INVASION OF GEORGIA, WE COULD BE USING THOSE RESOURCES FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE/EDUCATION. WHEN YOU GET UP IN THE MORNING I WANT YOU TO LOOK YOURSELF IN THE FACES AND ASK YOURSELVES HOW YOU HAVE BECOME WHAT YOU DESPISE. YOU USE TO BE DEMOCRATS NOW YOU ARE JUST PEOPLE WITHOUT A PARTY, WITHOUT CARE AND CONCERN FOR THE COUNTRY, WITH CONTEMPT AND SCORN IN YOUR HEARTS AGAINST A MAN THAT BEAT YOUR CANDIDATE FAIR AND SQUARE. YOU ARE THE VERY SAME TYPE OF PEOPLE PLATO FEARED IN A DEMOCRACY.
September 8, 2008 at 10:43 am
I CAN’T WAIT TILL NOVEMBER 4TH WHEN BARACK OBAMA BECOMES PRESIDENT AND MAKES ALL YOU HILLARY PEOPLE FEEL LIKE CRAP.
IT’S GOING TO BE SO GREAT TO WIN AND TO RUB IT IN YOUR FACES…..OH THE BLOGGING THAT I WILL DO…IT WILL BE SO GREAT.
September 26, 2008 at 4:36 pm
Hillary is an opportunistic whore.
You keep on drinking the Clinton cool aid.
October 24, 2008 at 10:25 am
I am so sick of hearing people who are anti-obama called racists, when every black person I know will vote for Obama just because he’s black. I don’t vote down racial lines, but, I live in a 70% black city, and my personal experience is that blacks will always vote for blacks, regardless of whether they are qualified, only for the reason that they are black. Bill Clinton did more than any of the other presidents in the past 30 years to help minorities and low income people, yet now all I hear are insults hurled in his direction simply because he’s white. Rwanda? What the hell do we have to do with any of the shit that happens there? What about Croatia, Georgia, Sudan, Somalia, Afghanistan, Uganda, the Congo, Azerbijan, Albania, Burma, India, Zimbabwe, Cuba..Hell even mexico where americans are kidnapped and killed daily, Liberia where they are praticing cannibalism? Millions of people on this earth are killed by dictators and “rebel” groups every day, children are kidnapped to be used as soldiers and sex slaves. How dare you BLAME our government for the actions of the africans who killed their own kind with machetes? We cannot control the entire world, but, I can see from your narrow minded view that you think we should only help control what happens to the blacks of other countries, even if their troubles are internally created. Why should we intervene in one country but not the others? What makes Rwanda so special. Slavery exists in profound numbers TODAY through africa, india, southeast asia…what’s being done about that? And furthermore, what do you think should be done about it? We are not our brother’s keeper. I see people like you every day who blame everybody else on all the ills of the world EXCEPT THE PEOPLE who committed the atrocities! It’s not Bill Clinton’s fault what happened in Rwanda, it’s the fault of the people who did the deed.
I think we should stop with the helping of all these countries and their stupid wars. That money should be spent PROTECTING our borders from criminal illegals and for education and healthcare costs here in america. Let the rest of the world sleep in the bed it made.
February 28, 2009 at 10:07 am
I love your site!
_____________________
Experiencing a slow PC recently? Fix it now!